Skip to main content

Spirals and Circles


So here is a mathematical answer to a question that I have quite often asked myself and seldom troubled my friends with: “Does life move in Spirals or Circles?” The course that life takes is often described as a maze by some and a road with lots of twists and turns by others. A complicated web of events, people, emotions and thoughts, caught between these is you, the spider. A lot of our religious books refer to the course of life as “the cycle of life”, which essentially means “the circle of life”. It is perhaps the phrase used most often during those innumerable philosophical discussions that boring people like us have over drinks with friends.

Yes, I have been ranting for quite a while, without really bringing in what I promised: the mathematics! In laymen terms, a circle is a two dimensional figure which is a collection of all points that are at equal distances from a given point. Essentially, a circle starts and ends at the same point. A spiral, is a three dimensional figure which is “A curve on a plane that winds around a fixed central axis at a continuously increasing or decreasing distance from the axis”.

Now, the arguments for both circles and spirals are logical and believable. However, what matters here is whether our conclusions are based on completely exhaustive reasons. If you consider life to be moving in circles, or say, “life is a circle”, you are talking about a two dimensional figure. The two dimensions could well be “time” and “experiences”. So if we were to draw the graph of life, it would look something like this:



This figure justifies the never ending behavior of life and the concept of rebirth in its essence. However, if we were to break life in a smaller compartment of say “a set of experiences” or “the life span of 1 year”, then this figure is highly inappropriate for a very basic reason that it does not encompass “life” in its entirety. Agreed your life moves in the above circle, but then you cannot deny the fact that your life is NOT static in terms of the range of experiences you have. Looking at this figure, what can you say about your life after the one year represented by this figure?

So, we can safely say that perhaps life does not move in a SINGLE circle. Perhaps it could be a collection of circles with the same radii, placed horizontally next to each other and touching each other only on the “Time” Axis? Yes, it could be that for a compartment of “life span of say 100 years”, wherein we keep moving from one circle to another as “time” changes. Now this model may seem appropriate for a compartment such as the one mentioned here, but it does not encompass the concept of rebirth which our previous model could.

Also, a major disadvantage of both the above mentioned models is that they overlook another dimension of life that is “perspective”, which forms an integral part of how we see life and how we experience life. It is undeniable that as “time” changes, a person’s “perspective” also changes. How you see the world at the age of 16 is very different from how you saw it when you were 6 or how you would see it at the age of 60! Now, “time” and “perspective” may not be linear functions of each other in anyway, (or they maybe) but they do change simultaneously. Hence, we present a figure more appropriate such as this:

  

In this figure, the “experience” axis remains constant while the “time” and “perspective” co-ordinates vary, which fits well with our above mentioned assumption of “changing perspective”. This looks more or less like a spiral without “moving away from a central axis”. The points in this figure are “equidistant from a central acxis.Readers might wonder about the usefulness of this model to the concept of “rebirth”. Well, this model also takes into account this concept as the parametric equation of the model:

X= 4tCos[t]

Y=4Sin[t]

Z=t

Is a modified version of the equation of the circle, wherein we keep coming back to the same “experiences” with a different perspective as time passes. Or to put it differently, the “cycle” of rebirth and death continues but as we move from one life to another, our soul matures and our perspective changes in a new birth!

P.S. This was a small attempt at “modeling” life in terms of three dimensions. We all know that life is multi dimensional and three dimensions would perhaps not suffice to model life. But, as they say “One step at a time”! However, this model is in a very basic and primitive stage and can perhaps be made more encompassing. Readers’ suggestions are most welcome. Further, I would be obliged if readers could point out any technical errors that I may have made in this particular model.

Comments

  1. woah! finally.. revelation!! awesome attempt! obviously, i'm not a mathematics person, but one thing that came to my mind was if there would any way 'technically' and 'graphically' where the so called spiral in the second graph would touch any other part of the same spiral. meaning, i'd like to discover if there can be a representation of may be having the same experience but at different times probably?! basically, does yr 2nd graph also show that it "Is a modified version of the equation of the circle, wherein we keep coming back to the same “experiences” with a different perspective as time passes.' ??!?!
    also, another question is that why would you want to keep 'the “experience” axis remains constant while the “time” and “perspective” co-ordinates vary,'? i mean, in my opinion the experiences also vary with time in one's life?! and may be then only at some point the experience may be same as the one experienced before? but why would they be CONSTANT?
    thanks for sharing nevertheless! =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. We keep coming back to the same experiences as time passes, that's the whole point I am trying to stress here. That's why the use of a circle/spiral wherein you keep coming back to the same experience.

    Saying that "experiences" are constant implies that as both time and perspective change, experiences that we have had earlier ideally do no change, we go around the same set of experiences with a different perspective.

    Besides, now when I think of this so-called model, I am not too sure if giving a third dimension like I have done is better or introducing a new parameter is better...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have doubts about the parametric equations that you have taken in the model. Will discuss this over some time, without fail!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, I have them too. Actually, lots of them. Perhaps the interpretation was very wrong. Haven't been able to find the time to work on this lately. Many corrections needed! :D

    ReplyDelete
  5. Something, I don't get how experiences are the "same". Similar, yes; but same? With a continuity in time and changing perspectives, I wonder if experience could ever be the same. Let me try to explain what confuses me.

    I think when you talk about experience, you, in essence, talk about something that is perceived by an "individual" about something separate from the individual (Note: this is consistent for both internal and external experience). What is important here is that you're looking at it from an individual's point of view. Experience as you talk about it in your note is essentially, "individual experience". Now if you allowed time and what-not to vary, the individual receives datum from the external world in a different way; the same external information is received by the individual in a different way. This means that experience can only be the "same" in a world on noaction (Action - purposeful behaviour). What I think you mean is that life brings us to similar circumstances, similar external environments. This also (to me) is hard to digest.

    I find it hard to believe that anything is ever the same, when you talk of man as a agent capable of action.

    http://mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap1a.asp

    ReplyDelete
  6. The link posted by you has been quite successful in adding yet another dimension to "experiences". When I say "same experiences", I mean "we keep coming back to the same experiences". More like a set of experiences till we've learnt to handle them, learnt to "live" them. The concept of Karma, cause and effect plays a major role here. Looking at experiences minutely we see that experiences are actually a function of our actions, the effects of the causes created by us. And, I do believe (atleast now, without any theoretical references to cite here) that till the time you don't create the right cause towards a particular effect, you keep coming back to it. To the same exact experience.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey!
    Here's what I understand from the above equations : If you know understand completely where you are, what you're into right now ( i.e. at t=0) then using the above equations, you can exactly predict what your experiences and perspective will be at some future time t=T.
    Now I see a underlying assumption here that life is deterministic, which it isn't. Your experiences and perspective evolve with the choices you make, which in turn are a function of your past experience/choices. In any given situation, one cant really determine a relationship between the choices you make and your past experience.
    So what Im trying to pitch here is that the "deterministic" nature of your model is incorrect, it has to be probabilistic.

    Bhavya

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bhavya!

    You're right about this being a deterministic model. Such an assumption was necessary for me to be able to answer the problem question of "Does life move in circles or spirals". A probabilistic model (more so a stochastic model) would perhaps be a better representation of the relationship between the "choices of people" and "past experiences" in a general setting. But I am not sure if it would help to answer specifically my problem question. :)

    Thanks for the suggestion though! Plants a germ of an idea in my mind! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. This was intriguing! I didn't realize that you were trying to fit the model to either a circle , or a spiral. My bad there. If that's the case, your choice is correct.

    Anytime!
    Bhavya

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The MIC Syndrome!

Today, with deep admiration for myself and a few others who helped me in my discovery, I present before my readers a not-so-new genre of males: The MIC males, short for The Messed up, In Denial, Crying males! At the risk of sounding sexist and fearing unwelcomed remarks, the usual disclaimer is as follows: The category of humans being described here is just from personal experience or/and experiences of others that I happen to witness quite closely and observed acutely. Before really describing this genre, it makes sense to tell you their importance in the world. Well, to say the least, they help in bringing variety to our otherwise boring lives! If you are finally tired of staring at the ceiling of your house, it’s time for you to go out there looking for these men! Where will you find them? Now that’s a tricky one! Generally, their physical characteristics can be quite deceptive and they do not hang out in clusters like the geese. You really have to be lucky enough to be able

It

He hated it. So much so that he couldn’t stand It for the shortest period of time. It was almost like a monster eating him up. Slow and steady, like an insect it would creep out of nowhere and linger around him for eternity. Making him almost claustrophobic with it’s presence. Like a rope tied around his neck, forbidding him to speak anything. All he could do was shouting in vain, hoping that someone would take it away from him. It was in It’s presence that the woman that he had loved so much had left him. It reminded him of those exam halls sitting inside which all he could ever do was staring at the empty answer sheet that he always submitted! Bringing back pathetic memories of the Conferences where he tried so hard to elicit some response from the other side. Or the umpteen attempts at making his audience laugh, failing most of the time. She loved it. So much so that it was like a part of her. She was used to it, like the chirping of birds, the presence of the wind. She did not fin